[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Outdated config.sub etc. breaking autobuilding

Hello Wichert, Developers,

On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > When a program only uses autoconf but not automake (many programs do this)
> > there's no better way to update these files than a "cp
> > /usr/share/automake/config.{guess,sub} . " .
> There is a better way: use the copies from libtool since they are a lot
> more recent.

Or do the right thing, and update the crap in our automake package. Too bad
the GNU autotools people didn't do this thing in a more sane way...
Maintainers should be safe to "regen" (read copy) the files from
/usr/share/automake/ to their build tree so as to guarantee they'll have the
hppa and ia64 stuff, for example...

Either that or have a package that provides an up-to-date
/usr/share/automake/config.{guess,sub} and that libtool and automake depends
on.  I'd maintain such package if the automake and libtool maintainers don't
want the hassle.

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Attachment: pgpmUd0v7oMO3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: