[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LDAP authentication with PAM

>>>>> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> writes:

    Wichert> Previously Brian May wrote:
    >> 1. pam_lastlog, pam_motd, pam_mail, etc do not appear to get
    >> used if pam_unix is used. I think this is because pam_ldap
    >> fails, and further processing is stopped.

    Wichert> That is because you used `sufficient' instead of
    Wichert> `required' for pam_unix: that one succeeds and PAM
    Wichert> doesn't bother to process the rest anymore.

I don't suppose there is anyway of saying "skip the next rule if this
one succeeds" is there?

Otherwise, like I said, I will have to move these lines down to the
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to: