Re: LDAP authentication with PAM
>>>>> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Wichert> Previously Brian May wrote:
>> 1. pam_lastlog, pam_motd, pam_mail, etc do not appear to get
>> used if pam_unix is used. I think this is because pam_ldap
>> fails, and further processing is stopped.
Wichert> That is because you used `sufficient' instead of
Wichert> `required' for pam_unix: that one succeeds and PAM
Wichert> doesn't bother to process the rest anymore.
I don't suppose there is anyway of saying "skip the next rule if this
one succeeds" is there?
Otherwise, like I said, I will have to move these lines down to the
Brian May <email@example.com>