[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: lb, lb-scripts

Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl> wrote:
>Quoting Colin Watson (cjw44@flatline.org.uk):
>> This doesn't sound like a good use of tasks. Should Little Brother
>> really be one of the choices presented when a new user runs tasksel?
>You're right ;)
>Rephrase: 'a virtual package 'lb' will supply lb-gatherer, lb-monitor,
>lb-scripts and lb-alerter'.  Would that be better?

That sounds a lot better to me (although technically it's a meta-package
or something, like communicator, rather than a virtual package). Thanks!

Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: