Re: ITP: lb, lb-scripts
Robert van der Meulen <email@example.com> wrote:
>Quoting Colin Watson (firstname.lastname@example.org):
>> This doesn't sound like a good use of tasks. Should Little Brother
>> really be one of the choices presented when a new user runs tasksel?
>You're right ;)
>Rephrase: 'a virtual package 'lb' will supply lb-gatherer, lb-monitor,
>lb-scripts and lb-alerter'. Would that be better?
That sounds a lot better to me (although technically it's a meta-package
or something, like communicator, rather than a virtual package). Thanks!
Colin Watson [email@example.com]