Re: ITP: lb, lb-scripts
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:56:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Robert van der Meulen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >this might be an 'ITP: lb-gatherer, lb-monitor, lb-alerter, lb-scripts',
> >with an included 'ITP: task-lb' that depends on all of the above.
> This doesn't sound like a good use of tasks. Should Little Brother
> really be one of the choices presented when a new user runs tasksel?
We desperately need to get rid of this mess that task-crap has become.
Wasn't someone working on that?