Re: Floppy and tftp - was Woody Freeze
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:14:55PM +0200, PiotR wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:58:02AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:07:04PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> >
> > Client: (well the image in /images/foo)
> > =======
> > kernel (see above)
> > devfs (speeds things up)
> I have this in mind, but over a 100Mbs Network is difficult to notice any delay in accesing devices
No, but you'll notice when multiple system start fighting over control for
/dev/log, /dev/gpmdata, and other generated /dev nodes.
> > ramfs (to localize the host, /tmp /var/tmp /var/run etc.)
> I do that via nfs. What are the benefits of doing this in ramfs?
There is no reason for storing anything in those directories permenanly?
And these also don't appreciate being shared.
Note: ramfs != ext2 on a ramdisk. It only uses the memory it actually
needs. So that < 50k of data in my (loaded) /var/run doesn't take 4M.
Simple, no?
- Nick Lopez
kimo_sabe@atdot.org
--
"Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but
that is not the reason we are doing it" -- Richard Feynman
Reply to: