On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:46:54PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 01-04-02 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Package: xinetd
> > Priority: extra
> > Depends: net-common
> > Provides: internet-superserver
> > Conflicts: internet-superserver
> Since you mention xinetd here, but not g2s, which is also a
> internet-superserver, do I need to change it like xinetd and will
> update-inetd in the new version also handle the config file format of
> g2s?
All the internet superserver's will need to be changed; all the one's
that don't use the same config file format as netkit-inetd will need
to have an update-inetd-backend written too (which is what handles the
particular format for an inetd).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpdex5h6brkG.pgp
Description: PGP signature