On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:46:54PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 01-04-02 Anthony Towns wrote: > > Package: xinetd > > Priority: extra > > Depends: net-common > > Provides: internet-superserver > > Conflicts: internet-superserver > Since you mention xinetd here, but not g2s, which is also a > internet-superserver, do I need to change it like xinetd and will > update-inetd in the new version also handle the config file format of > g2s? All the internet superserver's will need to be changed; all the one's that don't use the same config file format as netkit-inetd will need to have an update-inetd-backend written too (which is what handles the particular format for an inetd). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpdex5h6brkG.pgp
Description: PGP signature