On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:14:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Taral wrote: > > > apt makes all sorts of assumptions. Ever try running it (+dpkg) on a > > 486SL/33 with 8MB of RAM? It's painful. > > dpkg in unstable currently reads /var/lib/dpkg/status(and available) one char > at a time. Fixed in cvs. What about dpkg in stable? That's the one I was using on the laptop... > dpkg in unstable currently has inverted memory detection logic, and actually > performs worse with <= 24m ram. Somewhat fixed in unstable. You mean fixed in cvs? -- Taral <firstname.lastname@example.org> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."
Description: PGP signature