Re: Officially drop Linux 2.0 support? (was Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Officially drop Linux 2.0 support? (was Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up)
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:20:42 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010326022042.A11466@vitelus.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E14hT5i-0004X2-00@riva.ucam.org>; from cjw44@flatline.org.uk on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:15:10AM +0100
References: <20010326032802.A10414@riva.ucam.org> <20010325232548.A23541@will-13-191-dhcp.resnet.Colorado.EDU> <E14hSi6-0004OM-00@riva.ucam.org> <20010326014443.A24522@will-13-191-dhcp.resnet.Colorado.EDU> <[🔎] E14hT5i-0004X2-00@riva.ucam.org>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:15:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>   ipfwadm (will this work with 2.4's compatibility mode? If so keep it)

Yes. But not very well for anything more than trivial masquerading.

Reply to:

References:
- Officially drop Linux 2.0 support? (was Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up)
  - From: cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)

Prev by Date: Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
Next by Date: Re: Security-enhanced Linux by the NSA for Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Officially drop Linux 2.0 support? (was Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up)
Next by thread: ITP: wmix -- Dockapp mixer for OSS or ALSA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread