On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Now if people can refrain from filing duplicate RC bugs on already fixed issues > on debconf (and stop reassigning duplicate RC bugs on fixed issues to debconf > without even telling me), it _might_ make it in in 2 days. Joey, all you've had to do was say "Hi, please stick the existing debconf in testing", as opposed to "I don't want the current debconf in testing yet". > FWIW, I am very annoyed that testing has forced my hand in this manner, and > would have preferred to keep this version of debconf out of testing for > another month. I feel that this entire episode points to some fundamental > problems with testing that are not being addressed. You _HAVE_ to be kidding. Joey, there hasn't been a debconf suitable for testing ever since testing's existed: initially it depended on perl 5.6, then it conflicted with apt, now it's a whole new thorougly redesigned system. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpJyXZckJ_7a.pgp
Description: PGP signature