On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Now if people can refrain from filing duplicate RC bugs on already fixed issues
> on debconf (and stop reassigning duplicate RC bugs on fixed issues to debconf
> without even telling me), it _might_ make it in in 2 days.
Joey, all you've had to do was say "Hi, please stick the existing
debconf in testing", as opposed to "I don't want the current debconf in
testing yet".
> FWIW, I am very annoyed that testing has forced my hand in this manner, and
> would have preferred to keep this version of debconf out of testing for
> another month. I feel that this entire episode points to some fundamental
> problems with testing that are not being addressed.
You _HAVE_ to be kidding. Joey, there hasn't been a debconf suitable for
testing ever since testing's existed: initially it depended on perl 5.6,
then it conflicted with apt, now it's a whole new thorougly redesigned
system.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpJyXZckJ_7a.pgp
Description: PGP signature