Why isn't gcc-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) packaged (for kernel 2.4 builds)

["Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>]

I don't think you understand - I don't believe there is a bug in gcc.
The source code I am trying to compile is just not up to date with the
differences between 2.91.66 and 2.95.2.  While we work on updating the
source code to 2.95.2, there's value to me in making the older
compiler available in potato (or woody) so I can make a Debian package
out of it now.

On Mar 17, Matthias Klose (doko@cs.tu-berlin.de) wrote:
 > Neil L. Roeth writes:
 > 
 >  >  > A comparision against 2.95.2 isn't useful. Compare it with 2.95.3.
 >  > 
 >  > The program won't compile under 2.95.2, why would you expect it to
 >  > work under 2.95.3?
 > 
 > because 2.95.3 is a bug fix release. Until now I didn't see the
 > problem, so I cannot comment. Please send the preprocessed source.

-- 
Neil L. Roeth
neil@occamsrazor.net