Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001

To: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:51:36 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010316235136.A4728@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 871yrxzylh.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>; from tollef@add.no on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:29:14PM +0100
References: <20010316060008.A10109@debian.org> <[🔎] 871yrxzylh.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:29:14PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | This post is automatically generated. Please send comments to
> | bugscan@debian.org .
> 
> And postings to bugscan@debian.org bounces with the message:
> 
>   dark@master.debian.org:
>     (generated from bugscan@debian.org):
>     Child process of procmail_pipe transport returned 67 (could mean user nonexistent) from command:
>     /usr/bin/procmail

That's just him, others at bugscan alias got your message...

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001
  - From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>

References:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>

Prev by Date: Re: lintian whining about app-defaults file
Next by Date: Re: Xpdf fuckware
Previous by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001
Next by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 16, 2001
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread