Re: Package modifying its own control at build?
Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Oh right, that's nice. I always forget about that. It would be nice if we
> had a better way to deal with missing fields (so there is no risk of
> dangling commata).
Three words for you: Fixed in CVS.
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: