Re: Planning to split doc-rfc
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:48:15AM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > (I'd still like a thematic split, but I still know no way to do that that
> > doesn't imply looking through ~3000 RFCs manually, and that doesn't seem
> > reasonable.)
>
> Neither is blindly packaging all of them. I'd rather have 20 or 30 hand
> picked interesting RFC that a bunch of unclassified ones.
>
> Doesn't...
>
> doc-rfc-web
> doc-rfc-ldap
> doc-rfc-snmp
> doc-rfc-ip (or doc-rfc-networking ? )
>
> ... sound much more useful?
Which package is rfc698 in? Or rfc1815? Your design is a nightmare
to look through if you have an rfc number as opposed to looking up
the HTTP standard, and I find myself doing the first much more than
the second.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
Reply to: