Re: missing debconf dependancies
On 23-Feb-01, 14:23 (CST), Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> wrote:
> But I digress. We seem to have either a choice of making it manadatory
> that if a package uses debconf, it must depend on it. This may be more
> palatable than it was to early adopters like netbase last year; I
> dunno. However, this would require that debconf be section base, as eg,
> netbase is in base.
I thought section base was being phased out, as the idea of base is
orthogonal to the rest of the sections...
(and as this comment is orthogonal to actual topic of dicussion).
Steve
--
Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)
Reply to: