Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:30:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010223153047.C3129@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E14WIoA-0005Pa-00@riva.ucam.org>; from cjw44@flatline.org.uk on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:54PM +0000
References: <20010223060009.A23863@debian.org> <[🔎] E14WIoA-0005Pa-00@riva.ucam.org>

Previously Colin Watson wrote:
> These are all tagged fixed, which da-katie now does in response to NMUs
> rather than changing the severity (at least, assuming it recognizes them
> as NMUs - see bug #77362). The bugscan script should start excluding
> bugs with the 'fixed' tag set.

Hmm, good point. On my todo-list for this weekend. Maybe exclude
`wontfix' bugs as well..

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
  - From: cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>

References:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
  - From: cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)

Prev by Date: Re: Not everyone is linking shared libraries to libc
Next by Date: Re: Build-Depends
Previous by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
Next by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 23, 2001
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread