RE: Kernel 2.4: devfs: bugs
1) kernel 2.4 is part of the distribution
2) devfs is anything other than an "experimental" feature in the kernel
The old names aren't going to be "depreciated" any time soon, do you think?
I'd love to see how a package would have a dependency on 2.4 when there
isn't any 2.4 in woody/sid... and if there's no kernel for it to depend on,
what names do you expect it to use? ^_^
From: Dwayne C . Litzenberger [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 7:25 PM
Subject: Kernel 2.4: devfs: bugs
<< File: ATT00548.dat >> Should I submit bugs to any packages I find that
use the deprecated /dev
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - firstname.lastname@example.org
- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
- See the mail headers for GPG/advertising/homepage information.