Re: New gpg key and the overrides file
- To: Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: New gpg key and the overrides file
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:22:34 +0000
- Message-id: <20010205192233.A1776@polya>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010205103811.1379K-100000@dwarf>; from firstname.lastname@example.org on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:41:32AM +0000
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010205103811.1379K-100000@dwarf>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:41:32AM +0000, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Well, I've finally succeeded in automatically signing my packages using my
> new gpg key. Now all my uploads are identified as NMUs! Obviously the user
> ID in the overrides file is not equal to the new user ID of my gpg key.
> The question is: Must I report bugs against ftp.debian.org (or overrides
> file specifically) for each of my packages, or can I deal with all
> packages in one bug report?
AFAIK, an upload is considered a maintainer upload if and only if the
Maintainer: field in the control file is *identical* (name and email)
to that in the changelog. Even one character difference will cause it
to be considered an NMU.
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/