Re: RFC: bug reporting tool as standard [which one, if any?]
Am 27.01.01 um 01:31:25 schrieb James Troup:
> There is, IMO, a need for one of the bug reporting tools in Debian to
> be at standard priority;
[...]
> Now personally, I'm in favour of promoting 'reportbug' to standard; it
> is (again) IMO a much better tool than 'bug'.
I agree fully in that a) a bug reporting utility should have priority
standard and b) it should be reportbug - I haven't used bug for a long
time now; the querybts script alone make it worthwhile.
> The only problem is, it
> involves promoting python-base to standard. I don't see this as a
> problem, but I'm sure some will and to be fair, I am biased.
I would expect python on any reasonable Unix-like system these days.
Personally I'd even say `What the F*!<+ is going on, where is python' if
I didn't find it, so I'd even say it's important. But perhaps I do not
yet qualify as an experienced Unix person ;-)
Bye,
Mike
--
|=| Michael Piefel piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de
|=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin http://www.piefel.de/micha
|=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Reply to: