Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:36:30 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010123083630.B32100@vitelus.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010123163333.E3746@cistron.nl>; from wichert@valinux.com on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:33:33PM +0100
References: <87g0jgpx9y.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net> <[🔎] 87u26srtzy.fsf@raven.localnet> <[🔎] 87hf2ryl3d.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net> <[🔎] 14957.39266.491651.74104@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 87g0iaqoyj.fsf@matt.w80.math-hat.com> <[🔎] 20010123163333.E3746@cistron.nl>

On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:33:33PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> What's wrong with:
> 
> emacsen-common Suggests: dpkg-dev-el

It's a backward suggestion?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
  - From: Roland Mas <mas@echo.fr>
- Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
  - From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@sfere.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
  - From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
Next by Date: Re: Migration to Pentium?
Previous by thread: Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
Next by thread: Re: dpkg-dev-emacs vs. debian-changelog-mode vs...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread