Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version
Santiago Vila writes:
> something other than "2.2" or "testing/unstable" could potentially
> break any script or program which expects /etc/debian_version to be
> either "2.2" or "testing/unstable" (since this is what base-files provides).
> In this case not only there is no benefit from changing the file but
> it could be even harmful.
> So: Is there a *technical* reason to change /etc/debian_version other
> than it being just "nicer"?
This information could instead be stored in /etc/lsb-release. One of
the reasons for the creation of this file was to standardise across
the distributions the name and format of the file which contains this
type of information.
Support Open Source Ice-Cream