Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>>"Philip" == Philip Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Philip> As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires
Philip> "annoying manual editing of addresses" to reply to the list,
Why would you need to do that? Doesn't your MUA have a wide
Philip> if your mailreader does the reasonable thing and assumes you
Philip> want to reply to the original sender of the message, in liu
Philip> of a reply-to header.
If I hit the reply key, I would indeed want to reply to the
sender, rather than the whole list. Why is that not a reasonable
thing to do?
How do you suggest I reply to sender if someone scribbles all
over the reply-to header that the sender has set (in case the from
header is invalid)?
who had to edit no headers in order to send this message
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C