> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:42:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Ack!(tm). Not shades of rh7, I hope? I know that people using sid (like > > myself) are willingly sado-masochists, but a CVS GCC? > > GCC 2.95.3 is in final testing and due for release RSN, making it a > somewhat different situation. It's also binary-compatible with 2.95.2. That's why the "I hope" and the question-mark - I just saw the CVS branch bit, and wel-l-l-l ... EOT(tm).