[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Huh, gcc 2.95.3?

> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:42:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Ack!(tm). Not shades of rh7, I hope? I know that people using sid (like
> > myself) are willingly sado-masochists, but a CVS GCC?
> GCC 2.95.3 is in final testing and due for release RSN, making it a
> somewhat different situation.  It's also binary-compatible with 2.95.2.

That's why the "I hope" and the question-mark - I just saw the CVS branch
bit, and wel-l-l-l ...

Reply to: