[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: aewm, dagrab



On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 06:11:37AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:11:03PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Some people also seem to have missed the point that ITP's are posted
> > just so people can look at what you're doing and advise you if it seems
> > like a bad idea. If you don't want advice, why post an ITP? Sigh.
> To avoid that two people are working on the same package. Thats the one and
> only reason.

Well, I post such things for more reasons than that.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
                 We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
                                      -- Dave Clark

Attachment: pgpTI7j_rSHop.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: