Re: ITP: aewm, dagrab
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Since when we have the policy to filter packages? I think this is
> possible/good for task lists or recommended priorites, but not for including
> the software at all. Since we are unable to forsee which of the packages the
> usr community will accept and which ones will die (if any).
It's pointless to package two peices of software that appear to do an
identical job with identical design decisions. From the description I
read, both the cdda2wav and the other cd grabber are in that position.
And cdda2wav is already well-known and in debian.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: