Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages
From: Bastian Kleineidam <calvin@net.uni-sb.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:59:07 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0012290956380.2748-100000@phoenix.net.uni-sb.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20001228173212.A13801@quark.eou.edu>


!ocseirF iH

On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> Graphics
> |_Gimp
> |_Xfig
> etc...
Why dont you use existing hierarchies? I like those of Freshmeat and
even more the Sourceforge Trove.

Bastian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages
  - From: mechanix@digibel.org

References:
- RFC: pools and catagories of packages
  - From: esoR ocsirF <rosef@eou.edu>

Prev by Date: xfs segfaults with truetype fonts
Next by Date: Re: List of packages that could be dropped
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages
Next by thread: Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread