[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

perl 5.00{5,4} dependancies



I'm planning a mass automated -quiet bug reporting spree against almost
all packages that depend on perl 5.00{5,4}[-base]. All such packages 
should be updated to depend on perl-5.6 (possibly with 5.005 as an
alternate).

84 packages[1] would get bug reports; most are perl module packages.

Comments?

-- 
see shy jo

[1] libgtk-perl
    gnucash
    libgd-perl
    fml
    libunicode-map8-perl
    libsufary-perl
    libfile-sync-perl
    libmpeg-mp3info-perl
    libio-pty-perl
    libdigest-md5-perl
    libcompress-zlib-perl
    libkpathsea-perl
    libalias-perl
    libnet-perl
    liblocale-gettext-perl
    pilot-link-perl
    liblockdev1-perl
    webrt
    entity
    perl-5.005-suid
    libnet-ssleay-perl
    netsaint-plugins
    xvile-xm
    libterm-readline-gnu-perl
    libcorba-orbit-perl
    xvile-xt
    libtime-hires-perl
    libhtml-ep-perl
    xemacs21-basesupport
    libcdb-file-perl
    libapache-session-perl
    libmldbm-perl
    xemacs21-basesupport-el
    libmime-base64-perl
    libnewt-perl
    libipc-sharelite-perl
    libtext-kakasi-perl
    snap
    libcdk-perl
    libgtkxmhtml-perl
    catalog
    libgtkglarea-perl
    libxml-parser-perl
    libjcode-pm-perl
    auto-apt
    libgnome-perl
    dpkg-ftp
    libmail-cclient-perl
    libapache-asp-perl
    libtext-query-perl
    libft-perl
    libtext-iconv-perl
    pdl
    apache-perl
    inn
    libgladexml-perl
    pgperl
    freewrl
    inn2
    libset-object-perl
    libcgi-pm-perl
    vile
    libhtml-parser-perl
    libunicode-string-perl
    speedy-cgi-perl
    netcdf-perl
    xvile-xaw
    xemacs21-mulesupport-el
    libplot-perl
    libnet-rawip-perl
    libgnome-gnorba-perl
    libsql-statement-perl
    libterm-readkey-perl
    libtext-csv-perl
    emacspeak
    libtext-querysql-perl
    libcurses-perl
    libnet-socketssl-perl
    perl-tk
    postgresql-contrib
    libdbd-odbc-perl
    libgtk-imlib-perl
    freepwing
    premail



Reply to: