[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: goals for woody ? (Re: Release Date of Woody?)



On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> I think the easiest way to be sure the FHS will be implemented in every 
> package is to mass-report RC Bugs on every package that has 
> Standards-Version < 3.0.0
> then, thanks to package pools, the package will never go in Testing if 
> it's not corrected :)

Actually, that's not true: testing will note that there's 1 RC bug against
the package in testing (or x+1 RC bugs), and when a new upload of that
package is made without fixing the /usr/doc issue, there'll still be 1
RC bug against it (or x+1), and testing will let that in. The check is
"unstable RC bugs <= testing RC bugs (estimated)".

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
                       -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001

Attachment: pgpRsViLpQjd0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: