Re: lintian & libtool: are they friends now?
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:28:41PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:47:57PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > Previously Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > > oh, wonderful... unpatch configure.in... compile... run lintian ... $%$#!#
> > > > again lintian say binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath. moreover the workaround
> > > > (that old workaround i used to patch configure.in) is not present in
> > > > /usr/share/doc/lintian any more (i'll file a bug against lintian).
> > >
> > > You might need to run libtoolize again to update the libtool stuff
> > > in the package.
> > >
> > hmm ok, i run libtoolize -f yesterday. my program stopped compiling.
> > at first i thought it was libtool but finally i discovered it was debhelper.
> > i will re-run libtoolize again, this time with the right debhelper.
> it does not work. i still receive the same error from lintian. libtoolize
lintian (1.11.10) unstable; urgency=low
* Dammit, + sign in package name problems again
added a regression test for a foo++ package. Closes: #77216
* removed the libtool text in the rpath message, libtool no longer sets rpath
the upstream finally saw the light.
-- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:02:50 -0800
You are using version 1.11.10 of lintian?
> maybe i'm wrong, can i safely ignore the rpath message from lintian?
> this issue is keeping me from releasing a couple of packages.
Linux.Conf.Au -- http://linux.conf.au/
17th - 20th January, -- Alan Cox, David Miller,
Sydney, Australia -- Tridge, maddog and you?