Re: Bug#65256: devscripts: master.procmail example has no loop checking
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:39:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Julian Gilbey:
> > [...] So would the following work, in place of the
> > existing two lines (which are:
> > :0
> > ! $FORWARD
> > ), and have the same effect, minus the looping?
> >
> > :0
> > * !^FROM_DAEMON
> > * !^X-Loop: $FORWARD
> > | formail -A"X-Loop: $FORWARD" | $SENDMAIL $FORWARD
>
> I would use $SENDMAIL -oi $FORWARD here.
>
> [ The change your@own.mail.address -> $FORWARD for the X-Loop header
> should be harmless but I am not 100% sure ].
Good point, thanks!
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: