Andres Salomon <saloma@rpi.edu> wrote: > Is this necessary, with ORBit2 being worked on? How usable/stable > is orbit-mt? I need a multithreaded ORB, and very soon. I could keep the packages to myself, but I figured it wouldn't be hard to make them available to the world either. I haven't hammered on ORBit-mt yet, but it seems stable to me. I don't know how long ORBit2 will be until it's ready for general use, and I don't know how long it will be after that until it's packaged for Debian. By contrast, the ORBit-mt package (and ORBit-C++, which I ITP'd last night) are very close to being ready to go. If anyone has objections to me packaging ORBit-mt, let me know. I don't feel strongly compelled to do so, I just thought it might be useful to have a multithreaded ORB available for the time period between now-ish and ORBit2 release/packaging time. -- Sam Couter | Internet Engineer | http://www.topic.com.au/ sam@topic.com.au | tSA Consulting | OpenPGP key available on key servers OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
Attachment:
pgpNpw1SBUHHX.pgp
Description: PGP signature