Re: cleaning up our task packages
Ben Collins wrote:
> Maybe we need a way to define subtasks so we get output like:
> [ ] LDAP : LDAP libraries, server and clients
> [ ] LDAP Devel : LDAP Development libraries
> [ ] LDAP Server : LDAP Server
> [ ] LDAP Tools : LDAP Utilities
> [ ] LDAP Name Service : LDAP NSS and PAM for Name Service
> Makes much more sense. Tasksel could unfold only when asked to do so, like
> when a user is really interested in the tasks specifics, or they want only
> certian portions of a task.
I don't see a significant difference between "subtasks" and packages. If
you're really interested in the specifics of a task, you probably want
to see the actual packages that comprise it.
> Of course, this requires the tasksel author agreeing to implement
> something like this :)
Does't capt or aptitude or something do something like that?
see shy jo