Re: Woody Progress

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Woody Progress
From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@A-Es2.uu.nl>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:35:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001204103558.E2477@A-Es2.uu.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0012040229090.10803-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>; from galt@inconnu.isu.edu on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:30:01AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 20001204102517.D2477@A-Es2.uu.nl> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0012040229090.10803-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>

Hi John!

You wrote:

> > Wouldn't it be a good idea to set a definate freeze date now? That way,
> 
> Four words: Debian 1.0

?

-- 
Kind regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw                  | Si l'on sait exactement ce   |
|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi    |
| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl             | bon le faire?                |
|    bas@A-Es2.uu.nl             |               Pablo Picasso  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Woody Progress
  - From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>

References:
- Re: Woody Progress
  - From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@A-Es2.uu.nl>
- Re: Woody Progress
  - From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: task & skills
Next by Date: Re: Woody Progress
Previous by thread: Re: Woody Progress
Next by thread: Re: Woody Progress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread