Re: Starting unstable aptitude releases and RFC
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 10:23:36PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de> was heard to say:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > One question that I'd like people to comment on: I'd like to release a
> > precompiled binary package for this version, but I don't think releasing it as
> > "aptitude" is a good idea :)
>
> You could release it in some kind of project distribution? Just don't upload
> it to woody. As long as you hve a apt-getable line which you can tell us,
> there wont be a problem.
Hmm..I thought about that. People probably aren't going to want to replace
the old aptitude with the new one, though (that's what I'd assume),
at least not till I get downloading working again in it.
Bah, maybe I'll just get downloading working again and call it "aptitude".
I've already wasted a couple days doing this, my schoolwork can stand to
be ignored for another 24 hours or so :)
Daniel
--
/----------------- Daniel Burrows <Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu> -----------------\
| "Do you know why the prisoner in the |
| tower watches the flight of birds?" |
| -- Terry Pratchett, _Reaper_Man_ |
\------------- Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org -- Because. ------------/
Reply to: