Re: Proposal for a new package relationship option
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
Marcus> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:21:13PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
>> Exactly. gnus in its default configuration will not be usable with tm
>> in its default configuration.
Marcus> Without knowing more about this, I would say that this is a
Marcus> bug. Either they should conflict, or this problem should be
Marcus> resolved so that they are "usable" (I don't know what this
Marcus> means for gnus and tm).
May I suggest you learn a bit more about this case before you
start weighing in with opinions?
gnus and tm have no problem co existing on the sam machines,
and different users may use one or the other without an
issue. Indeed, for the longest time I used gnus and tm+vm in the same
emacs setup without any problems (I do not know if this is still
possible to do; I have not used tm for a while now).
However, there may be an issue with using tm and gnus in the
same session. I do not thikn this warrants a conflicts relationship,
and I am not convinced it is a bug.
A discourages relationship sounds interesting.
manoj
--
A Vulcan can no sooner be disloyal than he can exist without
breathing. Kirk, "The Menagerie", stardate 3012.4
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: