[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should we build woody packages against XFree 4 ?



On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 04:09:21AM +0100, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
>    Now that XFree 4 has made it into woody, should we compile new
> packages against it ? Will XFree 3.3 disappear, or will we have two
> versions of XFree in woody ? ${shlibs:Depends} will say `xlibs (>=
> 4.0.1)', is this acceptable for current packages ?

It will actually say "xlibs (>= 4.0.1-1)".

>    I have at least one package that works well under XFree 3.3 but barfs
> completely on XFree4, whether compiled under X4 or X3.3. I did not
> manage to have both versions installed, so it's a real PITA to debug
> (remote debugging would not work, nor would Xnest-like tricks), should
> we say goodbye to XFree 3 ?

The XFree86 version 3 packages will stick around for a while.  On i386, to
provide the libc5-compat X libraries and to provide a few legacy X servers,
and on alpha to provide a few legacy servers.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |         Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux                |         I met a man who wasn't there.
branden@debian.org              |         He wasn't there again today,
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |         I think he's from the CIA.

Attachment: pgpiXo5nhuz3Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: