Re: X 4.0.1 what's the deal?
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:22:48PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> > Woohoo, works! Thank you! :)
> >
> > Smells like a bug, indeed; the comment indicates that if the
> > connection to xfs fails, it _should_ fall back to the other
> > fonts listed. If I had multiple machines, I would've
> > been able to trace it myself. Have you filed a bug report
> > for this yet?
>
> Keep in mind that this may not be trivial to reproduce. I am not running
> xfs, and I have the default entries from dexter in my XF86Config-4:
>
> FontPath "unix/:7100" # local font server
> # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
> FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
>
> ...and my configuration works fine. So in some circumstances, it DOES fall
> back without a problem.
I have the same problem with 2.4.0-test10 but not at all with 2.2.14.
Hopes this helps
--
Etienne BERNARD <eb@pltplp.net>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
Reply to: