Re: emelfm up for adoption
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: cbf@debian.org, fizbin@debian.org, paci@prosa.it, debian@helixcode.com, rkrusty@debian.org, jgoerzen@complete.org, knghtbrd@debian.org, jrodin@jagor.srce.hr, mf@debian.org, younie@debian.org, tew@debian.org
- Subject: Re: emelfm up for adoption
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:13:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20001103111353.A5630@zombie.inka.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, cbf@debian.org, fizbin@debian.org, paci@prosa.it, debian@helixcode.com, rkrusty@debian.org, jgoerzen@complete.org, knghtbrd@debian.org, jrodin@jagor.srce.hr, mf@debian.org, younie@debian.org, tew@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20001028222207.A21398@cibalia.gkvk.hr>; from joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:22:07PM +0200
- References: <E13pcKx-0007Hq-00@loki.dhs.org> <20001028222207.A21398@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
#include <hallo.h>
Josip Rodin wrote on Sat Oct 28, 2000 um 10:22:07PM:
> There's been talk previously about a new section, either `Apps/Disk' or
> `Apps/Browser', but nothing came out of the discussion.
>
> I think we have enough disk-related and browser-related packages, the
> problem is which one would be more suitable... or something else?
What about a simple `Apps/Filemanager'? IMHO it would be a good place
and there are enough filemanagers to fill this section.
Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
--
=====================================================================
Eduard Bloch <eb@zombie.inka.de>; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04 5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
Expect the unexpected and expect the expected to be late.
Reply to: