Re: More things about the toolchain: ldconfig doesn't create libf oo.s o links anymore?
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 05:01:29PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> > It is not supposed to. It is supposed to create the .1 symlink, which
> > it will if it's missing.
> >
> > The .so link should come from the appropriate -dev package.
>
> !@&$*^!@)(*&$ me. I carefully deleted the .so from my -dev package :(
>
> Should I keep all the links in my package, or just
>
> /usr/lib/libfoo.so.1.7
> /usr/lib/libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.1.7
>
> and let ldconfig do the .so.1?
I'd just move the .so to the -dev package and leave both others in the
library package.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: