On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 12:30:50AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Martin Maciaszek wrote: > > But what about X 3.3.6? I so far avoided the upgrade to X 4 and > > still use 3.3.6 > > The xdm in X3 can't be PAMified since that mean either really > bad PAM support or breaking binary compatibility iirc. Breaking binary compatibility with what? Could you elaborate this a bit further? All I wanted was to get a TGT when logging in with xdm. I deduced that I need pam for this, but xdm doesn't use pam. Now I'm stuck. Regards Martin -- The meat is rotten, but the booze is holding out. Computer translation of "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak."
Description: PGP signature