Re: xdm not pamified?
Previously Martin Maciaszek wrote:
> But what about X 3.3.6? I so far avoided the upgrade to X 4 and
> still use 3.3.6
The xdm in X3 can't be PAMified since that mean either really
bad PAM support or breaking binary compatibility iirc.
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |