Re: new libdb2 and building packages
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> > /usr/include/db* is symlinked to /usr/include/db2
> > Is there a prefered location for building? (ie, which one will stay)?
> IMO, you are better off doing:
> #include <db2/db.h>
> and -ldb2
> This way you get explicity this version (makes even more sense when db3
> gets into the archive, which I hope has it's headers in db3/).
Cool, thats what I was hoping for ;-}
Now, are we going to have this problem again when db3 hits? Or are these
symbols versioned so that, say, sendmail can use db3 whilst the sasl/ldap
its compiled/linked against are still using db2?
Life'll kill ya -- Warren Zevon
Then you'll be dead -- Life'll kill ya