Re: Dates again.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> I had this thought as I wrote the mail. As it happens, I'd quoted the date
> from nm.d.o without localising, but I should have mentioned this. Either
> way - personally, I'm in agreement with the original poster in switching to
> the ISO dates. It would not be such a big deal if the developers were more
> of a homogenous group geographically, but with a large Europe/Americas mix
> there's the potential for a lot of confusion. I don't think the obstacles (a
> little bit of php recoding) outweigh the benefits on this one.
> Are there any real arguments for *not* changing to ISO?
We parse it backwards, here in Little Endia.