Re: severe deficiencies in our PAM setup
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:45:50AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
> > I've already started working on a new PAM mini-policy for woody that does
> > your first idea. What I'm leaning toward is using includes/alternatives
> > (with standard being priority 1) to configure the standard authentication
> > scheme.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to pipe pam files through cpp?
> So we would have #include <standard>. And we would have things like:
>
> #ifdef MD5PASSWORDS
> blah...
> #endif
Not really. I'de rather have a sane simple approach so admins wont
have to learn One More Thing to setup their systems.
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: