Re: ITP lame
>>"Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <email@example.com> writes:
Adrian> The non-US server is only for packages that include
Adrian> cryptographic program code.
Adrian> non-US has NOTHING to do with patents or other restrictions
Adrian> on the use of the packages. You are even allowed to use these
Adrian> packages inside the USA.
IMHO the policy says no such thing. It says that if a package
has actual crypto code, it goes in non_US, but packages with no
crypto code, just onterfaces to them, need not go into non-US.
Policy is not all-encompassing; and since it does not mention
patent encumberment, it is perfectly fine for non-US to host them, as
long as the local laws that non-US is governed by are not violated.
Why should parochial laws prevent this?
I am approached with the most opposite opinions and advice, and by
men who are equally certain that they represent the divine will. I
am sure that either the one or the other is mistaken in the belief,
and perhaps in some respects, both. I hope it will not be irreverent
of me to say that if it is probable that God would reveal his will to
others on a point so connected with my duty, it might be supposed he
would reveal it directly to me. Abraham Lincoln
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org