Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:06:49PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > packages into unstable. Helix is too stable for unstable, and too unstable
> > for stable.
> Not exactly true, as Helix Gnome is usually more cutting-edge than
> unstable Gnome.
In my experience, it's had a bug report to fix turnaround time of a under
a day if you can give a complete and reproducable problem. That's pretty
good for any problem, even trivial ones can't be expected to get fixed in
a matter of a few hours like I've seen with Helix Gnome.
Software has bugs, it's a fact of life. New software is more likely to
have unknown bugs that affect more people. What makes the Helix packages
so nice is the turnaround time for fixes. I don't know how they do it,
but they do.
Joseph Carter <email@example.com> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<kceee^> I hate users
<knghtbrd> you sound like a sysadmin already!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com