Re: ITP lame
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:53:32PM -0300, Rogerio Brito <firstname.lastname@example.org> was heard to say:
> > Of course the other problem is the code not yet being optimised (and
> > I'm not complaining but..) and bogging down my poor P133.
> Unfortunately, I have no experience here with older processors
> as my computer is a Pentium MMX 200 (overclocked to 250), so
> it is quite fast and I wouldn't see the perfomance problems
> (that's a downside of having a reasonably fast computer).
Interesting. On my P166 (no MMX), it ran but consumed essentially 100% of
my CPU time to decode a file, so doing anything else with the computer
caused breakups. I'm surprised, actually, that you don't see problems;
by that standard, shouldn't it be eating at least 50% of your CPU time?
/----------------- Daniel Burrows <Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu> -----------------\
| If you're reading | Human beings were created by water to transport it |
| this, you have too | uphill. |
| much free time. | |
\---- Be like the kid in the movie! Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org ---/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org