Re: ITP lame

[Samuel Hocevar <sam@via.ecp.fr>]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, John O Sullivan wrote:
> I'm surprised that lame hasn't been packaged already. Was it discussed and
> rejected previously?

   You're right about the Fraunhofer problem. See the WNPP page at
http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html (at the bottom).

Sam.
-- 
Samuel Hocevar <sam@via.ecp.fr>                     http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
1024D/29499F61 1999-04-22    1155 4B19 A50F 1136 6E60  A499 7CF3 F5AF 2949 9F61
dig goret.org @zoy.org axfr \
  | perl -e 'for(sort(<>)){print pack("H32",$1) if(/^c..\.(\w+)/)}' | gzip -d


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org