Re: qmail

To: Debian-Devel List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: qmail
From: Chris Lawrence <cnlawren@olemiss.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:28:40 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000821132840.A5509@olemiss.edu>
Mail-followup-to: Debian-Devel List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000821022204.A10121@dmgware.ca>; from odin@linuxfreak.com on Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:22:04AM -0400
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0008211336020.7513-100000@mail.linuxsolutions.net.au> <[🔎] 20000821022204.A10121@dmgware.ca>

On Aug 21, Dan Brosemer wrote:
> Debian officially recommends something?  That's news to me.

I believe we ship exim as the "standard" MTA (we changed from smail in
hamm or slink); I don't know if that makes it recommended or not.

Personally, I'd like to see postfix as the standard MTA, but we'd need
something like eximconfig for it first.


Chris

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: qmail
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

References:
- qmail
  - From: Niall Young <niall@holbytla.org>
- Re: qmail
  - From: Dan Brosemer <odin@linuxfreak.com>

Prev by Date: ITP: ADOLC (automatic differentiation library)
Next by Date: FW: Firewall Project
Previous by thread: Re: qmail
Next by thread: Re: qmail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread