Re: ITP: freeswan
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:44:37AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Sounds good. Can you bug upstream to include support for other
> > authentication methods eg SecureID? I'm stuck with a Windows IPsec
> > client until SecureID is supported. KAME (on BSD) doesn't appear to
> > do it either.
> SecureID is really in another "layer" of authentication. Freeswan is
> about authenticating hosts (among other things), not authentication of
> processes or people.
I don't really understand the distinction, and it doesn't help much
in any case. In short I have to use the Windows client to logon
to the remote network and I'd rather not!
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>