Re: Implementing "testing" (was: Re: Potato now stable)
> I'd just like to bring up the only point which really worries me about
> all this... what is the incentive for people to run their machines on
> 'unstable'?
I don't know - how many people are running glibc 2.1.92 now? How about X
4.0? GNAT 3.13? I'm running two out the three, because I'm too impatient
to wait for unstable. Provided I'm not that much of an anomaly, unstable
should be well tested; at the very least, brown paper bag bugs should get
caught.
--
David Starner
Reply to: